The machinations of these ignorant folk, who can best be referred to as “fake geek guys,” resulted in five separate categories receiving “No Award” this year, including Best Short Story and both long and short form Best Editor categories. Considering that SF is the genre that has always been at the forefront of exploring issues of oppression and intersectionality, this is completely absurd. This year’s Hugo Awards–the speculative fiction equivalent of the Oscars–was an unequivocal debacle, as a contingent of MRAs and their acolytes, impotently infuriated by what they perceived to be a rise in “SJW issues” in their genre literature, attempted to rig the voting system to prevent any work with pro-women, pro-minority, or LGBTQIA issues from being awarded the prestigious award. "The Phantom Editor Strikes Again", Joshua Griffin's April 29, 2005, review of Episode II.I: Attack of the Phantom, on TheForce.Science fiction fans are a notoriously easily-riled bunch.
#Star wars revisited fan edit archive
Wayback Machine archive of The Phantom Edit fan website.
" 'Star Wars' phantom edit: good, not better than the original". ^ Wilmington, Michael (June 18, 2001)."Kevin Smith speaks out about 'Phantom Edit' ". "Thumbs Down? Re-Edit the Flick Yourself". ^ Greenberg, Daniel (September 7, 2001).^ a b "Mystery of Star Wars phantom edit".^ a b " 'Star Wars' - The Phantom Edit"."Hollywood Goes Digital, Like It or Not". Archived from the original on July 15, 2009. ^ a b c Daniel Kraus (November 5, 2001).At points during the commentary, the viewer has the option to pause the film to view in more detail some of the things that the editor is discussing. Nichols followed up his edits of Episode I with an edit of Star Wars: Episode II – Attack of the Clones.Ĭalled Star Wars Episode II.I: Attack of the Phantom, the DVD contains a re-edited version (38 minutes cut, new runtime of 104 minutes) of Episode II in surround sound, with a commentary track. George Lucas cites The Phantom Edit as a key example of the remix culture created by the Star Wars franchise. " someone with a gift (and equipment) for editing" - Michael Wilmington, Chicago Tribune Film Critic.".Materialized from out of nowhere was a good film that had been hidden inside the disappointing original one." - Daniel Kraus, (November 5, 2001)."Smart editing to say the least" - Kevin Smith, Film Director.There were a total of 18 minutes cut from the original film, reducing the run time from 136 minutes to 119 minutes.Ĭritics and filmmakers have commented on the original Phantom Edit, in most cases providing the approval and recognition which furthered the fan edit movement. Reinstatement of deleted scenes in order to fill in plot holes in the film narrative.Removal of dialogue that specifies the nature of midi-chlorians as a biological basis for Force sensitivity.Removal of "Yippee" and "Oops" from Anakin's dialogue.
#Star wars revisited fan edit series
Lucasfilm, the production company of series creator George Lucas, condoned the edit and did not pursue legal action against its distributors. The DVD version has also been relabeled as Episode I.II, has a slightly different podrace from the VHS version, and contains more extensive editing to individual images and sounds that have not been entirely cut. Īvailable on VHS, DVD and later via BitTorrent, the DVD contains two deleted scenes and a commentary track by the editor as well as a few Easter eggs. Nichols of Santa Clarita, California in the September 7, 2001, edition of the Washington Post. Rumor initially attributed The Phantom Edit to Kevin Smith, who admitted to having seen the re-edit but denied that he was the editor. , NPR, PBS, and the BBC all covered the edit to various degrees.
The Phantom Edit was originally circulated in Hollywood studios in 20, and was followed by media attention.
0 kommentar(er)
